Global Financing Center · Comparison

Leasing vs Loan — Ownership Debt vs Lease Structures

How NPV, tax, residual value and IFRS 16 shape the buyer's structural choice.

Updated 2026-07-20·Editorial Standards Board·6 min read·Educational — not a recommendation
Quick Answer
The choice between financing an equipment purchase with a loan and leasing the same asset is an NPV decision on identical assumptions. Loans usually win on long-life assets where the buyer already benefits from depreciation and residual value. Leases win where the lessor prices residual value tighter, tax asymmetries favour the lessor, or the buyer wants to shift obsolescence risk. IFRS 16 has narrowed but not eliminated the structural difference.

Decision matrix

DimensionLoan-financed ownershipLease
Ownership at maturityYesDepends on structure
Residual-value riskBuyerLessor (operating) or lessee (finance)
Balance sheet (IFRS 16)Debt on BSRoU asset + lease liability
Tax treatmentInterest deductible, depreciation on assetVaries by jurisdiction & classification
Flexibility (end of term)Sale, keep or refinanceBuy, extend or return
Upfront capitalEquity + debt drawdownMinimal / advance rental
Choose a loan when
  • The asset has long useful life and predictable residual value.
  • The buyer benefits fully from depreciation and tax shields.
  • Ownership at maturity is strategically important.
Choose a lease when
  • The lessor can price residual value tighter (specialist assets, fleets).
  • Obsolescence risk is high and the buyer wants to shift it to the lessor.
  • Tax and depreciation asymmetries create a shareable surplus.

Worked example

A USD 20 million reefer fleet with 7-year useful life and expected 25% residual can be (a) purchased via a 5-year amortising term loan at 7.0% or (b) leased as an operating lease at USD 3.1m annual rental over 5 years with a return option. NPV comparison at the buyer's cost of capital, on identical residual, maintenance and tax assumptions, isolates whether the lessor's residual pricing or tax position creates real surplus.

Frequently asked questions

Are leases still off-balance-sheet under IFRS 16?+

No. Since IFRS 16 (effective 2019), lessees recognise a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all leases with a term above 12 months. The off-balance-sheet treatment of operating leases has ended for financial reporting.

How do I compare a lease and a loan on identical terms?+

Build an after-tax NPV on both, using the same cost of capital, the same asset and maintenance assumptions, and disciplined treatment of residual value and end-of-term options. The difference isolates the real economic surplus available in the lease.

When does hire purchase make sense?+

For small-ticket equipment where administrative simplicity matters more than optimising tax or residual mechanics. Title passes automatically at the end of the term against a nominal option.

Can leasing be ECA-backed?+

Yes. Cross-border lease structures can incorporate ECA cover on the lessor's exposure. Structures are more complex than direct loans but achievable for large capital equipment.

Editorial & legal note. Educational and indicative only. Structures, pricing and eligibility are subject to lender approval, jurisdiction and project-specific due diligence. Global B2B Group does not rank lenders. See our editorial & neutrality policy.
Investment Readiness
Screen your project across the full funding landscape

Independent, neutral tools to identify which channels fit your project profile.

Continue with our commercial resources

Hand-picked next steps for this topic — special purpose machinery and industrial project financing.

Home