工业项目风险仪表板
高管级风险视角不是一个分数,而是一个矩阵。指挥中心按八个维度评分每个项目,并聚合到组合级。
Executive risk owners, governance committees, boards
Eight risk dimensions
Budget, procurement, financing, engineering, documentation, regulatory, timeline and supplier risk are each computed deterministically from underlying project data.
Thresholds a board can act on
Scores are bucketed into low, medium and high with visible bars — no proprietary black-box index — so the review conversation is grounded in the same numbers every time.
Portfolio-level rollup
Individual project risks aggregate to portfolio averages, so leadership sees where systemic risk sits and can rebalance sourcing or financing effort.
Explainable, not predictive
Every score is derived from data already on the platform. There is no opaque prediction — anyone on the team can read the same input and reach the same conclusion.
FAQ
Is this a substitute for a risk register?
No — it is an executive overlay. Detailed risk registers still live inside the project workspace.
How often is risk recomputed?
Live on every load; the Refresh button also writes a daily snapshot for trending.
Can I disable dimensions I do not use?
Custom weightings are on the roadmap for enterprise accounts.
Does regulatory risk vary by country?
Yes — projects without a defined country of execution score higher on regulatory risk by default.
How is supplier risk defined here?
Supplier risk rises when a project has no active RFQ activity, since supplier position is not yet tested against the market.
Available languages
Related
打开指挥中心
高管级风险视角不是一个分数,而是一个矩阵。指挥中心按八个维度评分每个项目,并聚合到组合级。