Should-Cost Analysis

Also called: Cost Build-Up Analysis

Should-Cost Analysis — definition

Independent estimate of what a piece of equipment or service should reasonably cost, built from materials, labour, overhead and margin assumptions.

Should-cost analysis is used to benchmark supplier quotations against an independently derived cost estimate rather than relying solely on market comparison. It is commonly applied to high-value or custom equipment where few directly comparable quotes exist.

Why it matters to industrial buyers

An independent cost estimate gives buyers a stronger negotiating position and helps identify quotations that include unusual margins or inefficiencies.

Key reference points

Typical inputs

Raw material indices, labour rates, manufacturing overhead and reasonable margin assumptions are common inputs.

Common application

Frequently applied to custom or special-purpose machinery where market price benchmarks are limited.

Commonly confused with

  • Total cost of ownership

    Should-cost analysis estimates a fair acquisition price; total cost of ownership evaluates the full lifetime cost after acquisition.

How it is used in practice

Before negotiating a custom conveyor system, a buyer builds a should-cost model based on steel prices, fabrication hours and typical margins to assess the fairness of a supplier's quotation.

Frequently asked questions

Is should-cost analysis the same as a market benchmark?

No, a market benchmark compares against other quoted prices, while should-cost analysis derives an independent estimate from cost components.

When is should-cost analysis most useful?

It is most useful for custom or low-competition equipment where comparable market quotes are scarce.

Go deeper on the platform

Related terms

More in Procurement & Sourcing

Reference content only. Global B2B Group is independent of equipment manufacturers and financing institutions; definitions are provided for education and do not constitute engineering, financial or legal advice.

Home