UHT & Yoghurt Dairy Facility in Central Asia.
A 400,000 L/day UHT and cultured products facility procured under a hybrid delivery model, financed by an OECD ECA with strict FX and payment-risk architecture.
Client profile & engagement record
- Client
- Privately held food & beverage group (family ownership, third generation), Central Asia
- Scale at engagement
- ~1,450 employees, USD 180–210M annual revenue, four distribution depots
- Existing assets
- One legacy pasteurisation line at 60% of local demand, no aseptic capability
- Client objective
- Greenfield 400,000 L/day UHT and cultured dairy facility built to EU hygienic design standards
- Consultant role
- Independent process consultant retained by the sponsor; led requirement definition and chaired the technical evaluation
- Global B2B Group role
- Structured the RFQ, researched and approached process suppliers, normalised proposals. No supplier ranking, no commission from the buyer.
Decision makers involved
- Group CEO — mandate and final award decision
- CFO — ECA structuring, FX policy and covenant review
- Operations Director — capacity, product mix and shift model
- Head of Quality — hygienic design, HACCP and retailer audit requirements
- Independent process consultant — technical evaluation chair
Engagement timeline
- Requirement
- Weeks 1–12 — FEED, interface freeze between EPC and BOP
- RFQ issued
- Week 13 — identical brief to three European process suppliers
- Proposals
- Weeks 17–21 — normalised comparison, weighted scoring
- Award
- Week 24 — EPC award; BOP tendered locally in parallel
- Completion
- Month 28 — full commercial production
Engagement record verified against the project file and confirmed by the sponsor's CFO before publication. Company name, site location and individual names are withheld under a confidentiality agreement; figures are rounded and published with the project owner's approval. Global B2B Group is supplier-neutral and does not manufacture, install, certify or lend.
Challenge
The sponsor operated a legacy pasteurisation line at 60% of local demand and lost significant share to imports during peak-season shortfalls. Currency depreciation over the prior 24 months had also made imported UHT uncompetitive with a domestic alternative — but only if the plant could be built to international quality standards. The board authorised a greenfield 400,000 L/day UHT and yoghurt facility.
Strategy
A hybrid delivery model was chosen: the process island (UHT sterilisers, aseptic tanks, filling) was tendered as turnkey EPC to a single specialist, while balance of plant (civil, utilities, warehouse) was contracted as multi-contract under the sponsor's PMO. The rationale was: process technology is where wrap-value is highest, and BOP is where the sponsor had strong local execution.
- Process island EPC for warranty and performance guarantee
- BOP multi-contract for local cost advantage
- Interface specification between EPC and BOP frozen at week 12
- Hard-currency invoicing throughout to align with ECA loan
The hybrid rationale follows the framework in the Turnkey vs Multi-Contract guide.
Supplier selection
Three European process suppliers competed for the EPC scope. All three passed diligence; award went to the supplier that combined the strongest local service presence (essential for a 24-month warranty in a Tier 3 country) with the second-lowest price. Global B2B Group remained supplier-neutral throughout.
- 3 EPC bidders after documentary shortlist
- Weighted scoring: technical 35%, service 25%, price 25%, financial 10%, ESG 5%
- Local service presence weighted deliberately for warranty enforceability
- 10-year spares availability contractually guaranteed
Financing
The OECD ECA of the EPC supplier's country guaranteed 80% of eligible equipment and services. Given the country's Tier 3 classification, the ECA structured a Berne-Union political-risk element into the guarantee. Payment mechanics were built around a confirmed letter of credit and milestone-linked payments — no advance payment beyond a bank-guaranteed 15%.
The payment architecture followed the Currency & Payment Risk framework. Structural context on the Export Credit Agencies pillar.
Execution
The Incoterm was FCA at supplier premises — the sponsor's freight team ran consolidated freight from Europe via a Black Sea port. FAT covered the aseptic filling line at contract throughput on water and product simulations. Site commissioning ran 6 weeks longer than plan due to imported-utility-transformer clearance issues; the ECA loan grace period accommodated the delay without covenant breach.
- FCA Incoterm allowed sponsor to consolidate freight and cut ~9% on landed cost
- FAT on aseptic filler closed 6 NCRs pre-shipment
- Utility transformer clearance delayed hot commissioning by 6 weeks
- ECA grace period absorbed the schedule slip
The Incoterm decision references the Incoterms in Practice guide.
Lessons learned
- Hybrid delivery worked because the interface between EPC and BOP was specified BEFORE either award.
- Weighting service presence equal to price protected the sponsor when the utility issue arose — the supplier had local hands on-site inside 48 hours.
- FCA Incoterm with buyer-controlled freight saved meaningful landed cost on repeat consolidated shipments.
- Bank-guaranteed advance payments were non-negotiable and enabled by early ECA engagement — worth the two extra months in structuring.
- The ECA grace period turned out to be the most valuable financing feature — worth more than a marginal rate improvement would have been.
Executive takeaways
- Hybrid EPC + BOP is powerful when the interface is drafted upstream and the sponsor has strong local execution capability.
- Weight service and warranty enforceability in supplier scoring — not just price and technical fit.
- Buyer-controlled freight under FCA typically beats supplier-arranged freight on repeat corridors.
- Design payment mechanics to protect both sides — bank guarantees on advance payments are the norm, not the exception.
Related executive resources
Planning a similar project?
Global B2B Group can help you prepare a professional procurement strategy, identify qualified international suppliers, compare solutions objectively and explore suitable financing opportunities.
